Tag Archives: rebranding

The Branding Strategist: James Heaton

Organizations invest significant resources into branding. That doesn’t mean they are always successful. James Heaton, president and lead strategist of Tronvig Group, warns organizations to pause when they feel a sense of urgency to rebrand. Instead, he cautions them to be sure to address “the fundamental questions” about a company’s mission, objectives and opportunities as an essential part of the branding process. To help companies ensure their rebranding process will succeed, he has created a workshop to help distill down the company’s brand story to a simple and singular idea. It encompasses a four-to-five hour meeting with an organization’s executives, key staff and vital stakeholders—the company’s brain trust. At the end of the session, the company has a complete brand pyramid and a brand value map that will help guide all subsequent work. We interviewed James to find out how you can learn from his expertise.

Tronvig Group is a marketing strategy consultancy that focuses on intensive engagements conducting “strategic therapy.” Based on your experience, why do organizations need that type of assistance?

Organizations are often overly focused on doing things.They tend to be so caught up in doing things that they rarely take the time to ask: why are we doing this? To what end? In the act of doing all the things that must be done, we can forget to stop and consider whether we are doing the right things. Myriad urgent issues keep us from the crucial act of introspection. This means that during the course of a client engagement, there are an array of essential questions that we usually have to force the answer to: Who is our customer (guest, visitor)? What do they value? What is changing in our industry or in the behavior of our customers that will change the way we need to do business? What is our goal? How will we win by delivering greater value to our customers than can our competitors? How are our business practices and behaviors aligned to assure that we can deliver on our brand promise? Are they aligned to ensure we can win in our competitive sphere of action? At best, most companies have only vague and uncertain answers to these questions. Without these answers, however, an organization inevitably spends a great deal of time and resources on things that do not yield their intended results. Visual rebrands cannot right these strategic wrongs. Business strategy must be tied to brand strategy and the brand must operate in support of action—doing those very few things that will have the greatest effect toward the achievement of our goals. Organizations need this kind of assistance because it is arduous and often ineffective to self-medicate when it comes to strategy. Most companies just don’t set aside the time and resources to get this difficult work done.

What are other common mistakes organizations make regarding branding…and how can they avoid them, especially on the Internet?

Common mistakes:

  1. Thinking that branding is only about logos, identity systems, taglines, and other external things.
  2. Thinking that branding can be done by outside professionals while we simply carry on with our work.
  3. Thinking that branding will solve business or product problems.
  4. Thinking that branding is somehow discrete from business strategy, customer understanding, product quality, and everything else that a business must do to survive.

 You often say, “no one buys what you sell. They buy what is of value to them.” How can organizations convey that online, where so much research takes place?

This is a paraphrase from Peter Drucker. It is a reminder of that natural human tendency to see the world from only our vantage point. It is natural to think from the company’s perspective. It takes significant effort to undo this tendency and replace it with a genuine response to what the customer needs. The corollary to this statement is also a paraphrase of Peter Drucker: If you satisfy your customers you fail. This is because you must deeply satisfy the customers for whom you are uniquely equipped to deliver value. These issues are usually addressed only superficially. Drucker’s third question is of essence: What do your customers value? It behooves you to spend a lot of time working on deepening your answer to this question. This is the essential role of marketing—obtaining customer understanding so it can be acted on.

Many of your clients have said they no longer want to be “the best kept secret in town.” What are common reasons why so many businesses fall into that category?

If you are the best kept secret in town it means that you believe you offer value, but this fact is not well understood outside your organization. You are underappreciated. This has one of three causes:

  1. You have a product problem. You are not offering something that is genuinely of value to your customers. You only believe that you do. In this case customer understanding will inform you of the product modifications you need to make to provide the benefits that your customers demand.
  2. You have a marketing problem. Your offer is indeed of value to your prospective customers. But they are not getting the message because you have not effectively learned how to communicate your value or you are not marketing. This is a problem that can be addressed through activating an effective brand strategy with appropriate marketing support.
  3. You have a business problem. You are not able to deeply satisfy the customers that you have—or you are trying to be too many things to too many different customers, and as a result you are deeply satisfying no one. It is essential that you be able to deliver on the brand promise that you make. The brand promise itself must be simple, clear and resonate with its intended audience.

Tronvig Group has worked for clients in a wide variety of business and nonprofit categories. James Heaton has developed an effective brand diagnostic and marketing strategy analysis that brings clarity and insight to inform strategic decisions of all kinds. This is the fifteenth in a series of interviews with experts whose work relates to online reputation management.

 
 
Brilliant Branding: Lynda Decker, CEO of Decker Design

Branding is central to image management — especially on the Internet. Without a well-defined brand your organization’s online reputation management strategies can only be reactive.  Most importantly, your brand is how your organization is introduced to investors, journalists and potential clients and partners.  If it no longer reflects your company’s vision, it’s time to rebrand.

Decker Design is a top New York City branding agency. The latest example of their sleek work is a stunning campaign for New York real estate firm Klara Madlin (which follows their rebrand of the firm last year). BlackRock, Mathematica and White & Case are among the many other clients the cutting-edge agency has served.

We interviewed Lynda Decker, CEO of Decker Design, on the state of the industry and what you need to know if you are considering a rebrand.

What are the most common questions companies that are considering a rebrand ask you….and what should they be asking?

It really depends on the experience of the individual that contacts me. Individuals that have a strong background in marketing and have been through a branding exercise before, understand it is a process that takes time. They also understand that over that time insights are revealed, and that the path to creating the visuals involves many iterations. A successful engagement requires a great amount of information (about the company), clear objectives and a brand champion at the highest level. A rebrand will not be successful unless it is fully supported by the chairman, president or other member of the c-suite. There will always be efforts to resist change and change has to be led at the highest level.

Less experienced clients do not view a brand development engagement as a process. They are anxious for a solution—today. They see a new brand as a list of deliverables. This is problematic because they often want to skip the hard part—understanding who they are and how they are different. Whether you are an individual or a corporation, self examination is difficult.

Companies considering a rebrand should be asking themselves the following questions:

Why do you feel a rebrand is necessary?

Who is your competition? Are you and your competitors vying for the same audience?

Who buys your product? What segment is the most profitable?

How are you different? What is your point of view?

If you could give one piece of advice to a company before they begin the rebranding process, what would it be?

You should be looking for a partner. It’s important to find a firm that is a good fit and that has demonstrated insightful thinking. Know your objectives before you start to speak to firms, then ask about process and look at the team’s past work.

Large organizations often start with an RFP process that operates through their purchasing departments. That is a mistake. A brand development or repositioning isn’t a commodity you purchase, like paper. It is intellectual property combined with human interaction.

What mistakes do companies make when they begin a rebrand? How can they avoid them?

I think there is one significant, easily avoidable mistake that is common in the communications field. Clients can feel it is helpful when they offer solutions. I would suggest that it is more effective for clients to focus on providing insight into the problem.

Creative people are creative because they see connections others don’t. It’s a waste of resources to attempt to do their job for them. Instead, a great client provides information and defines the parameters of the challenge. A good creative partner will be a good problem solver. Having a client who provides insight into the problem helps the creative team find a unique solution.

The other error is to think that a “brand” is just a logo—a brand is every single way an organization is presented to the public. That extends beyond the communication program all the way to answering the phone, designing the office and making hiring choices.

How has digital technology impacted the value of rebranding?

I’d like to reframe that question and say that differentiation among brands has never been more important. It’s difficult to stand out when there are so many competitors trying to get our attention. People tune out as much as they tune in.

Just consider this in terms of “television.” Television is Netflix, Amazon, Hulu, and YouTube, maybe an HBO app— cable and broadcast are old school. Someone might experience your brand via a huge screen or a phone that fits in the palm of her hand. There are also giant screens that are experienced in public environments. It’s mind boggling how many ways there are to access the content they provide.

On top of all of the potential delivery systems to consider when shaping your brand, competition is fierce. The same technology that has created so many choices has also created low barriers for entry in most business sectors.

Can you rebrand just a portion of a company’s image, such as their website, while keeping their logo the same?

Yes, it happens all the time. Often, logos are tweaked because some aspect has become dated. Sometimes they just need a little Botox. Look at GE and Chase, for example. If you were to do a historical review of their logos, you would see that they are unchanged in principle but tweaked over the decades. The New York Times logo is another great example of this.

Often the expression of a brand is not necessarily in the logo but in a campaign that is built to communicate the organization’s core values. GE is a great example of a brand that represents innovation and has looked at multiple platforms through which to communicate that message. Here’s their positioning: GE imagines things others don’t, builds things others can’t and delivers outcomes that make the world work better.

That is the brand. GE communicates that message better and more consistently than almost any other organization. The “brand” is not just about the logo, although the logo is central to the program—the brand is the corporation’s core values.

GE uses a range of media. But I have to point out something they have done that is new and highly innovative: look at GE’s Instagram campaign. It takes the viewer on a digital snow globe journey. It’s a brilliant way to use social media to reinforce the brand and its core value of innovation.

So to answer your question, branding is not just a logo, it is multiple items that work together to communicate core values.

Lynda Decker is the founder and creative director of Decker Design, a brand communication agency that helps professional service brands differentiate their practices to gain market share. She studied in the Executive Education Program for Design Leaders at Harvard Business School; has a MFA in Design Criticism from School of Visual Arts; a MFA in Communication Design from Syracuse University; a BFA in Graphic Design from CW Post College. She is currently co-chair of the Women Lead Initiative of the AIGA.

This is the second in a series of interviews with experts whose work relates to online reputation management.