All posts by Shannon M. Wilkinson

About Shannon M. Wilkinson

Shannon Wilkinson is the founder and CEO of Reputation Communications.

Social innovator and technology consultant Rachel Botsman is the leading global authority on the new era of trust. Her name often surfaces during conversations about the reputation economy. She’s an award-winning author, speaker, university lecturer and media commentator. Her specialism is an engaging and intelligent long-view of how technology is transforming human relationships and what this means for life, work and and how we do business.

A recent EUobserver article, Trust is ‘gold’ in digital age, quoted her on this topic. “Many parts of the world do not appreciate that trust is society’s most precious and fragile asset,” she said.

As early as 2012, she observed that we are at the start of the shift from trusting people more than corporations or government. She called for a measure for this new era, “reputation capital,” defining it as the ‘the sum value of your online and offline behaviors across communities and marketplaces.’ That year at the annual TEDGlobal conference in Edinburgh, Scotland,  she posed this question: “If someone asked you for the three words that would sum up your reputation, what would you say?”

Botsman has spoken of a time where you won’t need to answer with a traditional “elevator pitch,” or even a list of references or credentials. Instead, she sees “a future in which resumes and even credit scores are irrelevant, replaced by an aggregated digital reputation based on our interactions in the collaborative economy.”

“I believe we are at the start of a collaborative revolution that will be as significant as the industrial revolution,” Botsman told the TEDGlobal audience in Edinburgh. She has further explored such ideas as the co-author of  What’s Mine Is Yours: The Rise of Collaborative Consumption. Pointing to services such as the vacation rental hub AirBnB, errand outsourcer Taskrabbit and community-based learning marketplace Skillshare as examples of how “the old market principles of sharing, swapping and bartering” have been “reinvented for the Facebook age,” Botsman notes that “we have moved from sharing information and music online to transferring trust about how we get things done.”

She forsees an “age where reputation will become your most important asset” and “reputation dashboards” will provide “a real-time stream of who has trusted you when, where and why.” Botsman acknowledges that privacy would be a major concern and a simple algorithm or score wouldn’t suffice, but she still believes the outcome would be worth it: “When we get it right, reputation capital creates a massive positive disruption in who has power, influence and trust. Reputation data will make the resume seem like an archaic relic of the past.”

 
 

You may not realize it, but computer “bots” continually scan the Internet and collect your personal information…including information you don’t even realize is online. Like your address and phone number. It is scoured from such public records as online telephone directories, driver license bureaus and the local courthouses that maintain legal records of property ownership. That has an impact on your physical security as well as your privacy…especially if you are a high-profile CEO.

Losing Control Over your Public Image

Maintaining a low profile in business or in their personal lives is a longstanding tactic used by individuals with high professional positions. Minimizing the visibility that results from too many media interviews or too frequent a presence on social media prevents overexposure and can add longevity to careers. Many celebrities and industry professionals in all sectors have maintained their standing for decades because they — and their managers — have carefully ensured they never become overexposed.

Unfortunately, in the Internet culture, such tactics also means that there can be little online about them that they or their representatives have placed online and have control over. This means that whatever else is said about them online rises to the top of searches and stays there. When you are responsible for the majority of the factual information about you or your organization that appears on the first two pages of a Google search, you ensure that no matter what else is said, it is counterbalanced. When you don’t do that, you have lost control over your public image. It is far harder and more time-consuming to regain it than to establish it in the first place. As a specialist in online reputation management for “influencers,” including advising Forbes and Fortune 500 clients, many of the issues we have resolved for our clients result from exactly that situation.

If You Don’t Tell Your Story, Someone Else Will

Bottom line: telling your story is a vital aspect of managing the reputation of an individual or an organization online and off.

If you don’t tell your story, someone else will.  Effective online reputation management entails “telling your story” online in an authentic way, then making sure that story appears in appropriate online platforms. Your story may be as short as you want it to be. If and when someone attempts to establish a different story, yours will provide a more factual and credible reference.  If you are a high-visibility individual and your story has already been told, there are many ways to add a fresh page to it – or a new chapter.

Celebrities have a range of options to do so. With TMZ paying a reported $5,000 for tips and paparazzi following many 24/7, they face continuous privacy challenges online and off. That is a great motivator.

Related reading: 

Angela Hrdlicka on Protecting CEOs, Private Citizens & VIPs

 
 
Right to be Forgotten on Google

Google has just launched an attack on “fake news and problematic content,” including “rumors, urban myths, slurs or derogatory topics.” That is good news for anyone (and any organization) plagued by such issues. It is bad news for low-quality content, fake links and other tactics used to trick Google into suppressing as well as raising online content.

We like it. Now you, the consumer, can flag false, biased, offensive and inaccurate content that Google brings up on search suggestions. You can also include a note that explains why Google should remove it. Equally beneficial, the Internet can potentially become a fairer playing field.

Last week Danny Sullivan, a leading search engine expert, wrote the defining explanation of what this means. These are excerpts from his article on Search Engine Land :

Google knows it has a search quality problem. It’s been plagued since November with concerns about fake news, disturbing answers and offensive search suggestions appearing at the top of its results. “Project Owl” is an effort by the company to address these issues, with three specific actions being announced today.

In particular, Google is launching:

  • a new feedback form for search suggestions, plus formal policies about why suggestions might be removed.
  • a new feedback form for “Featured Snippets” answers.
  • a new emphasis on authoritative content to improve search quality.

“Problematic searches” is a term I’ve been giving to a situations where Google is coping with the consequences of the “post-truth” world. People are increasingly producing content that reaffirms a particular world view or opinion regardless of actual facts. In addition, people are searching in enough volume for rumors, urban myths, slurs or derogatory topics that they’re influencing the search suggestions that Google offers in offensive and possibly dangerous ways.

“These are problematic searches, because they don’t fall in the clear-cut areas where Google has typically taken action. Google has long dealt with search spam, where people try to manipulate its results outside acceptable practices for monetary gain. It has had to deal with piracy. It’s had to deal with poor-quality content showing up for popular searches.

“Problematic searches aren’t any of those issues. Instead, they involve fake news, where people completely make things up. They involve heavily-biased content. They involve rumors, conspiracies and myths. They can include shocking or offensive information. They pose an entirely new quality problem for Google, hence my dubbing them “problematic searches.”

Read his full article: Google’s ‘Project Owl’ — a three-pronged attack on fake news & problematic content.

 
 

According to Variety,  “As soon as the New York Times story about Bill O’Reilly’s sexual harassment settlements hit on April 1, Color of Change began to mobilize.

The nonprofit African-American civil rights group sent an email blast to its 1.2 million members, calling on them to help ramp up a campaign to pressure advertisers to pull money out of Fox News’ “The O’Reilly Factor.”

The campaign was remarkably effective, hastening the withdrawals of more than 60 major advertisers from the top-rated hour in cable news.”

Clearly, social media is now the most powerful tool for activist groups to use on organizations whose behavior, they believe, merit boycotts.

In 2014 we experienced the power of hashtag activism: the response by activist group UltraViolet to the way the National Football League handled the Ray Rice domestic abuse scandal. In their criticism of the NFL’s actions, UltraViolet employed a telling combination of the online and off. During a recent game they hired an airplane to fly a banner over the stadium printed with the hashtag “#GoodellMustGo.”

With that banner, UltraViolet was able to very succinctly (and inexpensively) direct a tremendous number of viewers to an online community. They paired that effort with an online petition demanding that the NFL change its policies. Over 50,000 people signed it. And it worked.

As the Lululemon and other crises have shown, hashtag journalism can effect a change at the highest levels of corporate leadership.

How Corporate Leaders Can Navigate this Growing Movement

How can corporate leaders navigate this growing movement? Follow the conversations on social media as they continue to develop, including #hashtags on Twitter. Stay aware of the key issues concerning women. Those include employment opportunities, low minimum wages, the lack of women on boards and the glass ceiling so many face. If you’re a CEO, tuning in to these and related concerns will help you avoid becoming the focus of the next wave of hashtag protests (and nightly newscasts). It will also help ensure you avoid the type of online reputation crisis that can impact your brand as well as your company’s stock valuation.

 
 
Right to be Forgotten on Google

The Association for Accountability and Internet Democracy (AAID) announced today that it supports the Right to be Forgotten bill in the state of New York. The bill is being presented by Assemblyman David I. Weprin.

In a statement circulated to the media, AAID President Dan Shefet stated:

“Benefitting from concrete experience with the implementation of the Right to Be Forgotten in Europe after almost 3 years – pursuant to the landmark judgment of 13 May 2014 of the European Court of Justice which consecrated the Right to Be Forgotten as embodied in the Directive 1995/46, replaced by the General Data Protection Regulation (Art. 17) – we have seen that the Right to Be Forgotten has allowed thousands of victims throughout the European Union to reclaim their dignity and their right to live a normal life unaffected by online exclusion from society.

Our European experience is very encouraging and we strongly endorse your initiative to allow New York State residents to avail themselves of the same protection.

We also support the proposed adaptation of the Statute of Limitations since defamation is of a continuous nature on the internet.”

*

Here at You(Online), we recently interviewed published an interview with AAID’s founder: Dan Shefet: Creator of the Internet’s Ombudsman. We have also published extensive information related to the Right to Be Forgotten and believe it is an important bill to support.

 

 
 
Internet law information

We are all increasingly hearing about hot button issues such as fake news controversies, the “digital divide” and the range of narratives influencing public opinion on the internet.

In the United States, those issues are affected by the laws governing free speech and Internet content. At Reputation Communications, we are committed to educating the greater public about the laws, opportunities and nuances inherent in Internet perception-shaping and publishing.

Here at You(Online), we publish the most extensive resources specific to those topics.

Recent highlights include the following articles, which examine the “Right to be Forgotten,” Internet laws and one way President Trump protected his brand–something every public figure and many CEOs should do.

Dan Shefet: Creator of the Internet’s Ombudsman He made worldwide headlines in 2014 when he forced Google to remove links to defamatory information about him. He has since established the Association for Accountability and Internet Democracy (AAID).

An Attorney’s Advice for Removing Negative, Defamatory and Infringing Material from the Internet  Steps to take when you are a twibel target, to sue or not to sue, and “SLAPP,” a meritless lawsuit filed against a defendant in retaliation for speaking out against a public issue or figure.

President Trump’s Astute Online Reputation Management Playbook  Trump’s moves include purchasing 3,643 website domain names with variations of the word “Trump.”

As a trusted source of information on these topics, our blog has attracted a worldwide readership and been cited in leading media platforms. Please share our content with your friends and colleagues who care about these issues…and follow us on Twitter @reputationnews.com.

 
 
President Trump's reputation management

CNN broke a story yesterday showing a rare inside look at the steps public figures take to protect their reputations from defamation on the Internet. Since 1997, according to the network, President Trump’s team has purchased 3,643 website domain names with variations of the word “Trump.”

That is a classic online reputation management strategy to protect one’s name from the attacks and extortion attempts that come with being a public figure. Celebrities and high-net wealth individuals have been snapping up website domains utilizing their names for years. They cost $12 each at Google Domains, which is half the cost charged by other providers. If you do buy one (or thousands), select the private registration option. That will shield your identity from the public and make it harder for CNN to find your stash should you become President. And certainly, anyone planning a role in politics should follow President Trump’s playbook before they take a single step toward launching a campaign.

In 2014, we wrote about a cybersquatting lawsuit Donald Trump won against a man who developed four parody websites using his name. The sites published anonymous “commentary, often disparaging, on Trump and his television shows,” according to CNN.

Such practices have proliferated on the Internet for years,” we wrote. “Facebook, Twitter and other social media platforms are also used for cybersquatting. Celebrities and other public figures are a common focus of such sites. So are CEOs and other high-profile executives.

“Many “domainers,” as the instigators are known, purchase unsecured domain names with the intent of charging high fees to sell them back to their victims. Creating parody sites can be a ploy to force them to do so faster.  Victims often feel they have little recourse over the situation or don’t want to take legal action that would attract publicity.

“Trump’s attorneys used the Anticybersquatting Consumer Protection Act as the basis of their suit, which was filed in March 2013. (The sites were created in 2007.) The law permits damages of up to $100,000 for each unauthorized domain. In this instance, the court ruled that the domainer must pay $32,000 in damages.”

If this topic interests you, check out Avi Selk’s article in the Washington Post: “Trump’s 3,000 websites — and what they say about his rise to power. “

Related articles:

Donald Trump’s Ascent to Republican Party Presidential Candidate

Winning Presidential Campaigns in the Internet Age

What to Do When You Are the Victim of Online Defamation

 
 
CEOs and Online Reputation Risks

College-educated professionals between the ages of 40 and 60 have long formed a significant part of our clientele. They include attorneys, C-Suite and mid-level executives, law enforcement and medical professionals, financial services experts, MBA candidates, and established artists and authors.

They are computer conversant, but are not digital natives. Often they lack an intuitive understanding of how to use the web for self-promotion. In fact, they are the demographic least likely to be using the Internet to their advantage. We help them to craft an online presence that supports their professional goals. That includes replacing outdated content currently coming up high in their Google results.

Creatives

Artists and authors need to promote their work in a comprehensive way: with up-to-date websites and strategic social media messaging. They also need to connect with and engage with the audience that most matters to them, including decision-makers in their industries. We help them increase their visibility across all fronts.

Critical-Stage Career Builders

Mid-level employees need a web presence that reflects their career accomplishments, technical skills, and a personal appearance appealing to young recruiters and hiring managers. In an increasingly turbulent economy, this sector is at high risk for unemployment and can find it harder to move from job to job due to their higher income and seniority.

We help this demographic how to best showcase their strengths and be competitive, appealing prospects for promotions and recruitment.

Mid-level managers and job-seekers who are 50 or older:

As The Wall Street Journal reported in November 2016, the 55-and-older crowd is now the only age group with a rising labor-force participation rate. Still, millions of professionals over the age of 50 are unemployed. Age discrimination also remains a problem for many older job seekers.

We offer these professionals a detailed road map to creating an online profile that best promotes their value to employers, clients and shareholders.

All online reputation management uses reactive technical actions including search engine optimization, social media management and other strategies. But these are just one component of building a desirable online reputation.

Reputation Communications provides a customized approach to online reputation management that begins with claiming ownership of your online brand. While we utilize the essential technical repair tactics, our focus is on proactive reputation building and smart reputation management that utilizes effective public relations tactics in the digital age.

Over 3 billion people worldwide now use the Internet. The world is truly a stage and you’re on it. How big or small is your role online? And what information can the world find out about you?

Your online reputation doesn’t just “happen” to you. At least, it doesn’t have to.

Related reading:

Reputation Reboot: Our Real-Life Online Persona Advice Column

Reputation Communications CEO Shannon Wilkinson: Interview with an Expert