Tag Archives: Internet defamation

Trolls are profitable for many websites

Online “trolling” isn’t a new phenomenon, but it has grown alongside the prevalence of comment sections and social media, according to the New York Times’ Farhad Manjoo.

“As long as the Internet keeps operating according to a click-based economy, trolls will maybe not win, but they will always be present,” Whitney Phillips, author of This Is Why We Can’t Have Nice Things, tells Manjoo. Wired’s Laura Hudson recently offered a similar assessment, and back in 2011 Forbes.com contributor Larissa Faw zeroed in on the crucial reason why many websites haven’t done more to combat trolls: “They undeniably drive traffic.”

Websites like Huffington Post and TechCrunch have struggled with this issue, and Twitter has promised to do more, but it’s telling that some of its users have started taking things into their own hands through apps like Block Together. As Manjoo points out, “unless social networks, media sites and governments come up with some innovative way of defeating online troublemakers, the digital world will never be free of the trolls’ collective sway.”

The New York Times has since hosted an Op-Ed page discussion, The War Against Online Trolls, featuring multiple points of view. On Gizmodo, Ashley Feinberg explores the subject in depth: How Twitter Could Beat the Trolls, And Why It Won’t.

 
 
Internet law

Donald Trump has won a cybersquatting lawsuit against a man who developed four parody websites using his name. The sites published anonymous “commentary, often disparaging, on Trump and his television shows,” according to CNN.

Such practices have proliferated on the Internet for years. Facebook, Twitter and other social media platforms are also used for cybersquatting. Celebrities and other public figures are a common focus of such sites. So are CEOs and other high-profile executives.

Many “domainers,” as the instigators are known,  purchase unsecured domain names with the intent of charging high fees to sell them back to their victims. Creating parody sites can be a ploy to force them to do so faster.  Victims often feel they have little recourse over the situation or don’t want to take legal action that would attract publicity.

Trump’s attorneys used the Anticybersquatting Consumer Protection Act as the basis of their suit, which was filed in March 2013. (The sites were created in 2007.) The law permits damages of up to $100,000 for each unauthorized domain. In this instance, the court ruled that the domainer must pay $32,000 in damages.

This Harvard Law link summarizes the law. Wikipedia provides an in-depth overview.