Tag Archives: 2016 Presidential candidates

Like many of you, we are transfixed by Donald Trump’s ascendance to the top of the Republican Party. His boldness has dominated the GOP Presidential campaign. His Twitter stream keeps him at the top of the news. His message resonates with millions. Watching the GOP grapple with this startling situation provides an insightful lesson in messaging.

Consistent messaging is an essential part of reputation management. That means presenting a unified brand—and a clear and distinct identity–all the time, across every platform. Once that unified brand is established, it can be amplified. That ensures your audience will encounter your brand in mainstream media outlets, at the top of Internet searches and on social media.

Like political campaigns, successful reputation management programs share three factors in common:

  1. The campaign begins by identifying the image you want to project.
  2. That image is authentic. (Otherwise, your audience won’t find it credible.)
  3. That image is expressed through a clear message that is transmitted across all the platforms where it will reach the audience that matters most to you.

Donald Trump’s message is clear. But the Republican Party’s is less so. Division within its ranks has led to an identity crisis that helped fuel Trump’s rise.  (Even the Koch Brothers, the Party’s most important supporters, have been utilizing a PR campaign to reboot their image.) It will be fascinating to watch how the Republican Party resolves this issue after the GOP Presidential candidate is officially announced this week.

 
 

Social media is an important platform for 2016 Presidential candidates. Facebook, Twitter and Instagram matter because they are where 18-24 year olds are getting their news – and communicating with their friends. Women are big social media users, too. Getting them to the polls will impact who wins the election.

In Hillary’s Race For 2016: Turning Followers Into Votes, on Forbes.com, I examine which candidates are winning on social media. Here are five reasons why Hillary is in the lead:

1.She has the most control over her online image: if anyone enters a Google search for “Hillary Clinton,” much of the first two pages of results will be sites she manages. Her digital assets include:

2. Facebook. She has almost one million likes on Facebook, where women aged 18 to 29 are the majority of users.

3. Twitter. Hillary has almost 4 million followers on Twitter; Jeb Bush just over 250,000. 37% of female Internet users between the ages of 18-29 use Twitter.

4. Instagram. Instagram is the most popular social media platform for people in their 20s.

5. She has an Official Hillary 2016 Playlist on Spotify – a collection of upbeat, inspiring songs to accompany her campaign. They can be widely shared by followers on their Facebook and Twitter feeds.

This doesn’t mean the other candidates lack digital assets (Donald Trump’s substantial media footprint includes almost 2 million Facebook likes).  It just illustrates the importance of social media currency in the 2016 election…and elsewhere in politics.

This post includes excerpts from an essay first published by Forbes.com on June 22, 2015. That article has been shared over 14,000 times on Facebook.